فرمت فایل: ورد- Word  

مرجع فایل - قابل ویرایش ) 

تعداد صفحه : 50
In other views, organizational knowledge is not merely consider as individual one. Some of knowledge exist in group for [10]. Then the knowledge which is measured or measure something should cover 2 classification of knowledge i,e implicit and explicit and group, individual and organizational one. The second dimension of this tetragonal basis of figure 1 is types of knowledge in an organization, individual and group from implicitly and explicitly. Figure 2: equipoised cube for measurement method the necessities for The cubical volume of figure 2 indicates integration of tetragonal base in measurement method with types of knowledge in organization So we have a cube of 6 types of knowledge (from the intersection of implicit and explicit knowledge with indivisual, group, organizational knowledge) that each of then must be compared in the Tetragonal of "knowledge volume" , "knowledge volue" , "knowledge interest and expenses" and "Transformation speed of knowledge". Now we should find a knowledge management model which is capable of integrating with this cognitive tetragonal model –Nonaka- Jakichi Model is a suitable one to reconcile with this cognitive tetragonal model and can be considered as a basis for measurement model –Nonaka- Takochi Model as a cognitive model is based on types of knowledge. Hidden and obvious information have been discussed exactly in this model. In this model indivisual, group, organizational knowledge are converted to each other in a loop form too. [11] Then ,Nonaka. Takochi Model can be delineated as measurement Model base. But it should be mentioned here that this model has a dynamic nature.[12] in dynamic Models There are several main and important indexes that separate them from

قسمتی از محتوی متن پروژه میباشد که به صورت نمونه ، بعد از پرداخت آنلاین در فروشگاه فایل آنی فایل را دانلود نمایید .

  

 « پرداخت آنلاین و دانلود در قسمت پایین »